Weighted-average six-month term-deposit rate from the RBNZ retail survey (B3, INR.MBI05.T07). Latest month: 3.45% for 31 Jul 2026.
From 31 Mar 1965 to 31 Jul 2026 (561 months): mean 6.31%, median 5.44%; low 0.82% (31 Jan 2021), high 18.00% (31 Jul 1987). Published average, not an offer from any one bank.
New Zealand's six-month term deposit rate is a retail savings benchmark from the Reserve Bank's B3 retail interest-rate survey, series INR.MBI05.T07. It is a weighted average of the advertised six-month term-deposit rates offered by surveyed institutions, compiled monthly, so the headline figure is the latest survey month and not a rate any single bank promises. The survey is a comparable reference across the market; offers you see may differ by institution, balance and term.
The chart shows the monthly survey history and the table lists the same values in reverse date order. The "versus the previous reading" line compares the latest month with the one before it, and the mean, median, low and high summarise the run in this build. Range buttons only shorten the window, and Chart and Table present one series in two forms. Because it is a published average, the rate can lag changes in wholesale funding costs and the official cash rate, and it can move when institutions reprice rather than when policy changes.
About this desk
The Brazil desk leads with the Selic target, read from the BIS central bank policy rate series for Brazil, then US, Mexico and ECB rates. The Selic target is set by the Banco Central do Brasil's Copom and is the anchor for the overnight interbank rate; the BIS series is the overnight Selic target from 1999, with earlier stretches splicing other central-bank instruments. It is drawn as daily steps because it changes only at Copom decisions.
All desks show the same series in a different order, so the figures do not change when you switch. Values are republished with attribution to the BIS; this site is not an official BIS publication. The build ingests no Brazilian retail lending rate, so that page is absent rather than estimated. Nothing here is financial advice, and readings may lag their source.